Beware of Logical Fallacies...

The following are a list of logical fallacies compiled from Between One and Many and then expounded upon and applied specifically to the Creation Vs. Evolution debate. I have encountered ALL (but #11) of the following fallacies in debates with evolutionists, and provide examples I have encountered. The names have been left out to protect the guilty.

  1. Unsupported Assertion:

    The absence of any argument to support a claim.

    Example- Evolution is a proven fact (really, so prove it!)

  2. Distorted Evidence:

    Significant omissions or changes made in the evidence of an argument that alter its original intent.

    Example- Taking the Bible out of context, over and over and over and over and over ...

  3. Isolated Examples:

    Nontypical or nonrepresentative examples that are used to 'prove' a general claim.

    Example- A select few Christians are hypocrites, therefore, ALL Christians are hypocrites.

  4. Misused Statistics:

    Statistics that involve errors such as poor sampling, lack of significant differences, misuse of average, or misuse of percentages.

    Example- All scientists are evolutionists (what kind of scientists did you sample?!? Evolutionary ones?)

  5. Red Herring (smoke screen):

    An irrelevant issue introduced into a controversy to divert attention from the real controversy.

    Example- evolutionist in response to my website: You better stop this mumbo-jumbo or I'm gong to pull out a can of whop [butt] on you, cause stone cold says so!

  6. Circular Argument (begging the question):

    Using the claim as the warrants or grounds for an argument.

    Claim- The earth is old because the geological strata are old.
    Warrant- the geological strata are old because the fossils are old.
    Grounds- Fossils are old because the earth is old.

  7. Hasty Generalization:

    A claim that is made hastily based on an incomplete or insufficient amount of evidence.

    Example- Microevolution (Moths change shades) occurs. Therefore, macroevolution must have occurred.

  8. Stereotyping:

    The assumption that what is considered to be true (or thought to be true) of a larger class is true for all members of that class.

    Example- All Creationists are ignorant religious bigots.

  9. False Dilemma:

    A generalization that implies there are only two choices when there are more than two.

    Example- Science Versus Religion, there is no middle ground or compromise. Either accept one or the other.

  10. False Analogy:

    The comparison of two different things that are not really comparable.

    Example- Dawkins' "computer program = microbiology experiment" debacle

  11. Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc:

    The assumption that because one event preceded another, the first event must cause the second.

    Example- * (from 19th century) Because maggots would appear on meat days after it was cut, it was once thought that the meat caused the maggots- in other words the maggots came from the meat. Now of course we know that maggots do not come from meat, and given a certain treatment (such as the freezer), maggots will not appear on the meat.

  12. Slippery Slope:

    The assumption that just because one event occurs, it will automatically lead to a series of undesirable events even though there is no relationship between the action and the proposed events.

    Example- Since Macroevolution was removed from required state curriculum in Kansas, Kansas students will now be dumber and less likely to succeed in school and life.

  13. Halo Effect:

    The assumption that just because you like or respect a person, whatever he or she says must be true.

    Example- The Big Bang occurred because Steven Hawking says so.

  14. Ad Hominem:

    The claim that something must be false because the person who said it is not thought to be credible, regardless of the argument itself.

    Example- Did it ever occur to you that you are a crazed religious nut? (and therefore I am not going to listen to a word you say, or try to refute your arguments).

  15. Loaded Language:

    Using language that has strong emotional connotations to evoke an emotional response from the reader.

    Example- The decision to remove Macroevolution from required course material has made a joke out of Kansas.

  16. Hyperbole:

    A claim made with extreme exaggeration.

    Example- The Kansas State Board of Education has made a joke out of science!

  17. Straw Man:

    An argument made in refutation that misstates the argument being refuted. Rather than refuting the real argument, the other side constructs a man of straw, which is easy to knock down and makes the other look bad.

    Example- (micro)Evolution has been observed. You are stupid for not accepting evolution.

  18. Ignoring the Issue:

    An argument made in refutation that ignores the claim made by the other side.


    Me: What Scientific evidence is there that something can come from nothing?
    Evolutionist: I didn't think that creationism was based on scientific evidence.

  19. Non Sequitur:

    An argument that does not follow from its premises. In other words, the evidence provided does not support the claim.


    Me: What Scientific evidence is there that life can come from non-living matter?
    Evolutionist: Given time, anything can and will happen.
    [*This is a blatantly false statement that does not support the claim]

In line with contemporary trends, the replica watches 2018 Pilot Series TIPO CP-2 flyback chronograph has two retro look: the first echoes of its aviation predecessors, bronze, bronze grain dial and rubber-lined Brown oily nubuck leather strap. The replica watches sale second, built of vintage steel, aims to bring closer relations with the world of motorcycles, using an elegant, grained, gray-grained dial with a green, oily leather strap with rubber-lined lining. Both strap with titanium metal pin replica watches uk buckle, to ensure complete safety. The replica rolex back cover is fitted with clear sapphire crystal glass, giving the wearer the opportunity to admire its in-house El Primero speed mechanism. Retro modern style and cutting-edge fashion clever fusion, the pilot series TIPO CP-2 return chronograph will be a dazzling fashion accessories, as the overall shape to add smart and handsome heroic.